Facts: For the convenience of the parties the trial was held in the air conditioned chamber of the respondent judge Garcia. The complaint was under the premise that such act is in violation of the right to hold a public trial.
Issue: Whether or not such proceeding of holding trial in the chamber of the judge in violation to the principle of right to a public trial.
Held: It is not in violation of the right to a public trial since the trial was still open to public and there is no showing that the public was deprived to witness the trial proceeding.
Popular Posts
-
CONFLICT OF LAWS NOTES By: Evelyn De Matias PRINCIPLES AND DOCTRINES Extraterritoriality - General rule: Philippin...
-
“Borrowing Statute” – Ex: Sec. 48, Rule on Civil Procedure – “ if by the laws of the State or country where the cause of action arose ...
-
Facts: Edward Christensen is a citizen of the State of California and domiciled in the Philippines . He executed in his...
-
Facts: Felipe Ramos was a ticket freight clerk of the Philippine Airlines and was allegedly involved in irregularities in the sales of ...
-
By: Evelyn Chua Bergantinos-De Matias Section 2 – Searches and Seizures People v Marti 193 SCRA57 (1991) “ marijuana leaves on ...
-
Facts Prior to the incorporation of the City of Manila under the Republic Act No. 183, petitioner Vilas is the creditor of the City. A...
-
" military members exempted from the right to bail” Facts: This is a consolidated case of members of the AFP who were charged wi...
-
Facts: The petitioner invokes his constitutional right to information on matters of public concern in a special civil action for mandamus ...
-
OBLIGATION AND CONTRACTS Prepared by : Evelyn Chua Bergantinos-De Matias Essential elements in the principle of latches: (1) conduc...
-
Facts: BJ Productions, Inc (BJPI) is a holder of a Certificate of Copyright no. M922 issued on January 28, 1971 of “Rhoda and Me” which...
No comments:
Post a Comment