Facts: For the convenience of the parties the trial was held in the air conditioned chamber of the respondent judge Garcia. The complaint was under the premise that such act is in violation of the right to hold a public trial.
Issue: Whether or not such proceeding of holding trial in the chamber of the judge in violation to the principle of right to a public trial.
Held: It is not in violation of the right to a public trial since the trial was still open to public and there is no showing that the public was deprived to witness the trial proceeding.
Popular Posts
-
Industrial peace within the private security sector. This is the main objective of the Philippine Association of Detective and Protective A... -
“Borrowing Statute” – Ex: Sec. 48, Rule on Civil Procedure – “ if by the laws of the State or country where the cause of action arose ...
-
IMMOVABLE PROPERTY • Lex situs (where the property is situated) – character of immovable property as an isolated ob...
-
Facts: BJ Productions, Inc (BJPI) is a holder of a Certificate of Copyright no. M922 issued on January 28, 1971 of “Rhoda and Me” which...
-
Facts Prior to the incorporation of the City of Manila under the Republic Act No. 183, petitioner Vilas is the creditor of the City. A...
-
Facts: Edward Christensen is a citizen of the State of California and domiciled in the Philippines . He executed in his...
-
Facts Prior to the incorporation as a chartered city, the Municipality of Zamboanga was the provincial capital of Zamboanga Province. ...
-
CONFLICT OF LAWS NOTES By: Evelyn De Matias PRINCIPLES AND DOCTRINES Extraterritoriality - General rule: Philippin...
-
Facts: The petitioner invokes his constitutional right to information on matters of public concern in a special civil action for mandamus ...
-
Facts: Petitioners assail the constitutionality of the Republic Act No. 7675, otherwise known as "An Act Converting the Municipal...
No comments:
Post a Comment