Facts: A complaint was filed before the fiscal’s office constituting an offense in violation of a city ordinance. The fiscal did not file the complaint before the court immediately but instead filed it 3 months later. The defendant’s counsel filed a motion to quash on ground that the action to file the complaint has prescribed. The fiscal contends that the filing of the complaint before his office already interrupts the prescription period.
Showing posts with label Zaldivia v Reyes G.R. No. 102342. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Zaldivia v Reyes G.R. No. 102342. Show all posts
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
IMMOVABLE PROPERTY • Lex situs (where the property is situated) – character of immovable property as an isolated ob...
-
Industrial peace within the private security sector. This is the main objective of the Philippine Association of Detective and Protective A... -
Article IX (B), Section 7. No elective official shall be eligible for appointment or designation in any capacity to any public office or p...
-
Facts: A complaint was filed before the fiscal’s office constituting an offense in violation of a city ordinance. The fiscal did not file t...
-
“Borrowing Statute” – Ex: Sec. 48, Rule on Civil Procedure – “ if by the laws of the State or country where the cause of action arose ...
-
Facts Prior to the incorporation as a chartered city, the Municipality of Zamboanga was the provincial capital of Zamboanga Province. ...
-
Facts Prior to the incorporation of the City of Manila under the Republic Act No. 183, petitioner Vilas is the creditor of the City. A...
-
Facts: BJ Productions, Inc (BJPI) is a holder of a Certificate of Copyright no. M922 issued on January 28, 1971 of “Rhoda and Me” which...
-
Facts: Edward Christensen is a citizen of the State of California and domiciled in the Philippines . He executed in his...
-
CONFLICT OF LAWS NOTES By: Evelyn De Matias PRINCIPLES AND DOCTRINES Extraterritoriality - General rule: Philippin...